The ABC Of Success In Viktorovsky, Or How To Know Yourself Through Holes

2024 Author: Harry Day | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-17 15:43

Recently, stubborn advertising of Burlan's "system-vector psychology" has begun to creep into the networks more and more often. Out of curiosity, I decided to understand what kind of animal this is. I dug a little (fortunately, it's easy to do on the Internet), and found that the founder of all this was a certain Tolkachev V. K.

I must say right away that it is always more pleasant to study the original source. When I realized that Burlan was positioning himself as a student of Viktor, as fans call him, I simply renamed the method itself (calling it “psychology” instead of “psychoanalysis”) for obvious copyright reasons, I decided to study the original source.

The book is thick, listed as a popular science publication, published in 2008 (New York-Berlin-St. Petersburg), everyone can download it. Somewhere I saw information that was published almost with public money, so people loved the author. And now in St. Petersburg this method is widely practiced at trainings, and on the Internet there is a whole website of the Academy of Systems Thinking.

Since my education is mathematical, I looked forward to a feast of logic, or at worst, dialectics. Moreover, such a lure that the book will be understandable to everyone, including non-specialists. Well, I think there will finally be something to read in an accessible form, and at the same time to enlighten, because the author refers to Freud as the primary source of his method, and even his 1923 article. Here you will involuntarily be in awe. Moreover, further in great detail, line by line, his article is analyzed.

So, starting from the programmed erogenous zones, the author tells us that they influence the psychotype so much that it becomes a "role genetic program of behavior." In general, the message is correct, and without Freud it is clear that everyone has their own erogenous zones.

These habits define character. Let's admit. Then the author begins to attract as much ancient philosophy that the soul is "poured all over the body" and pours out through the holes. And the holes are the erogenous zones, which just determine the character. In fact, there is no contradiction to logic. Further, lengthy arguments just about dialectics, the book of Genesis, culture, civilization, man, the study of words, probably, is interesting to philologists or aesthetes. But you have to wade through all this in order to reach the main thing.

Conclusions - "everything has its opposite, everything is bifurcated." Further, the concept of a Capsule of Living Substance (LIV) is introduced - in the form of a bifurcated person. There is a head and there is a body. I immediately have an idiotic question - is the head not the body (the doctor's explanation - the head is the body, but the head is not the body)? It seems that there is usually a body and there is Consciousness, Subconsciousness. Well, here is a comparison with a tree, probably something from the ancient concepts, so vaguely remembered. We are pouring something into KVZH, pouring something out.

But the author considers the following to be the main postulate of his science: "Here we will reformulate it in the form of VA Ganzen's quarto-cosmic postulate: ANY INTEGRAL REALITY OF THE OBSERVED WORLD NEEDS TO INTEGRATE TEMPORAL, SPATIAL, INFORMATION AND ENERGY."

Further, the author offers a matrix of reality - energy (fire), information (air), time (water), space (earth). All reality can be put into this matrix. Again, it seems, we have not heard anything new, except that the long name of the matrix.

Supporter and successor of the case V. A. Hansen, the author agrees with Heraclitus that "everything is one." Next comes the reasoning that all the elements of the matrix are in a person. “Each of us has some individual mental properties (or a group of properties), as it were, accentuated, prevail over others. Through these properties or accentuations, our PURPOSE manifests itself, our innate functional role-playing predestination to perform certain social roles, the essence of which is always archetypal. And as you and I have seen, our physiological and somatopsychological PREPARATIONS are in close correlation with our functional purpose,”- this statement contains some kind of program that is difficult to change. But then the author says that “on the basis of systemic thinking, one can even“PREVENT, (CLARE, HEAR CLARE, THINK, CLEARLY THINK, albeit probabilistically, one's own and someone else's meaning, you can predict your own and someone else's future”.

This is already a clear reference to esotericism, that is, on the basis of the system, fitting into the matrix, one can “read”. By the way, I remembered a video: one wonderful girl in a yellow dress meets guys on the street and, apparently, with the help of clairvoyance (system-vector analysis), unmistakably diagnoses them - this stupid, this stingy, this lazy and so on. And advertising was a system-vector psychology (see above, an article by Mr. Burlan).

But back to Tolkachev. So what is the value of his method? “Know yourself, and you will finally become an intelligent person, intelligently correcting yourself and the environment,” - in general, any school says the same thing. But, the highlight of this method is that you realize what type you are, and then it will become easier for you to live. Here is the search for oneself, and self-understanding, and the cultivation of a creator in oneself.

Finally, the author proceeds to the basic principles of character typing. There are so many typifications in the world, one more.

So, there are 8 types: anal, urethral, dermal (skin), muscular (muscular), ocular (visual), auditory (sound), rinal (olfactory), oral. To them are added such qualities as extraversion (introversion). Moreover, the middle type between each.

To determine what a person is, the author recalls ontogenesis and traces the path individual-subject-personality that a person can go through. Then he moves on to ETHOLOGY, the science that studies the conditioned behavior of animals, as well as the reflex and instinctively conditioned behavior of humans, in contrast to psychology, which deals with consciousness. Psychoanalysis and psychosynthesis, according to the author, "study deep mental disorders." Well, let alone "systems psychology" is a qualitatively new science, and the appropriate name for it is "hansenism". In general, the author's desire to highlight his science is understandable. Let's see if this can be called a science below.

"Achievements of science System thinking, first of all, should be directed at a critical rethinking of the classical philosophical verbiage" - this is the vector of application of the new science. The author probably calls a classical verbiage something like the study of the same dialectical materialism in higher education, because by age he was just supposed to study it. Indeed, there are enough attacks on communism, the Soviet Union and everything connected with this period.

And the first blow was struck at the long-standing fear of people to talk about man as an animal. Fear, it seems to me, is greatly exaggerated, no one has ever denied this at the level of biology. But no, the author immediately goes to the basic principles of STAI, thanks to which both animals and people survived.

The first principle is hierarchy. There is a dominant, there are subdominants, there is a majority (the author calls it "soap"), the most downtrodden ("cattle"). Moreover, the hierarchy promotes order. The hierarchy extends to people (an example is the hierarchy of a school). “Relationships between people are always built according to the laws of the pack. Humanity in relationships is a utopian dream,”the author condemns. And it gets a little scary, because there is no way out - there are such groups everywhere. And all this is laid down at the level of instinct.

But the functional-role behavior of each individual depends on somatic erogenics, that is, erogenous zones. And only uniqueness and individuality depend on the central and peripheral nervous systems. “Functional-role behavior is based on conditionally unconditioned reflexes and on complexes of instincts that provide the vector function necessary for the survival of the flock. Naturally, concrete behavior is cultivated by the social environment. - the author writes, that is, all our behavior is only for the survival of ourselves and the pack. It's hard to disagree.

Instincts are different, for example, collective, cognitive, sexual, and so on, we take monkeys and remember. Further, the author smoothly moves on to the topic that man is a political animal, talks about power, again turning to gorillas and chimpanzees, who are also engaged in politics within the hierarchy - they unite, seize power, and so on.

The main types of society are gerontocracy and tyranny. The parallels with human society are obvious, the methods of maintaining power are the same. But tyrants are loved because they are leaders, Teachers. But democracy is better. “The free enterprise society turned out to be able to realize in a completely acceptable form for people more socialist ideals than the society of“real socialism”, this is especially evident 26 years after the bourgeois revolution. Communism is possible only in wasps and termites. And Lenin and Stalin created totalitarian states.

All these excursions into history, ancient Greek philosophy, are probably interesting, but somehow they again distracted from the topic. Let's move on to monkeys who not only like to live in a hierarchy, but also want to support each other, that is, communicate to mitigate conflicts. That is, even monkeys are capable of behaving humanly, but humans are not capable of humanity in relationships (see quote above).

First we say “human animal”, and then that “is not capable of humanity”, then - monkeys are capable of “pacifying behavior”, then we meet the phrase “people, like pygmy chimpanzees, are able to maintain relationships in which aggressiveness is reduced to a minimum, the hierarchy does not interfere with friendly communication, and this communication itself is encouraging and pleasant. Damn, I'm completely confused.

So, in the wake of speculation about everything in the world, the author rolls up to the test, which is able to reveal all your "inclinations", and then, read above, develop superpowers. These tests are on the site, modified by followers, you will be sent beautiful pictures with color illustrations, percentages, in general, everything is very modern. Why pay attention?

Tests are a popular thing. And here are some CHILD psychologists wondering - damn it, but if there is such a program, it’s since childhood, can’t it be corrected? This is where I want to give such psychologists a hand, because the adjustments and advice given by Tolkachev are very, very ambiguous, about which I will give examples below. The tests relate specifically to ADULT behavior, even if they are modified for children, they still reveal a person's SEXUAL preferences. It is clear that this can be done in childhood. That is, if a person is an animal, and all this is a program, then either launch a virus, but in any case BREAK. Do we want this?

But - as a mother, I am against such tests for my, for example, minor child. Only you do not know where this test may lie in wait. At school, for example, permission to conduct surveys is not offered (or not always). That is, your child can be forcibly tested and then, perhaps, give advice not to you, but to the class teacher. But testing a child is a private life, according to the law, only with the permission of the parents. This also applies to children's centers, psychologists always sit there and constantly test. What exactly - they may not tell, because this questionnaire cannot be taken head-on, and everything will depend on the qualifications of the psychologist.

I would like to highlight only the most characteristic passages and recommendations of the author when describing types.

Representatives of the anal type (this is already directly according to Freud's text) have three qualities - accuracy, thrift, stubbornness. It goes on to say that these are people who derive pleasure and benefit from potting. In general, we have already heard this. But here the author comes to the main idea - that the holes in the human body - the boundaries of the mucous membranes and skin - are the most sensitive. Accordingly, by the name of the type, it is quite possible to guess the sensitivity of which hole in question. I agree that the classification is simple. Let's skip the long descriptions of the childhood of this type, with the acquisition of various habits, for example, "going to bed", painting pictures with excrement, all for the sake of getting pleasure through a certain hole.

Subsequently, as they grow up, these people are prone to graphomania or litigation. Basically, they are phlegmatic, and they like to rub with their palms (imitation of soaping). But at the household level, it can be sadists (bites his lip, breaks his arm, douse them with boiling water, and the like). However, behind them is like a stone wall. I immediately introduced myself - a partner who put you on a chain in a cell. Brrr. But all the locks work.

And finally, the author draws conclusions - since this is a defining hole, then "anal sex is vital for such people." Again, perhaps. This is where the author ascribes a tendency to pedophilia. The recommendations relate specifically to the additional impact on the zone (let's remember about child psychology, so if you follow the logic, we will advise such children to excite themselves in order to restrain the tendency to sadism?). Next is homosexuality. Long and romantic.

And here is about the children: “If you drive a little boy out of the pot when he is engaged in psychological therapy, then a reflex clamp is formed at the exit from the digestive tube. With frequent initiation, the clamp will begin to rise and reach the top of the esophagus, and the boy will stutter. If stuttering is an anal complex, constipation should be treated. Diarrhea is a neurotic state of the anal. Perhaps such a recommendation is, in principle, normal. There are also soft guidelines for guiding children of this type.

Well, and one more detail of this type is the tendency to necrophilia. Some not very nice set turns out.

Representatives of the muscle type, according to the author, are the bulk of those living in Russia. That is, the pleasure of muscle activity, a kind of heroes who become addicted to drugs released during exercise. Tension is relaxation, this is the basic formula for the existence of a muscle. Muscles rarely reach intellectual heights, but they are very hardy. In general, where there are more difficulties, there is also a muscle. Muscles are prone to necrophilia and murder because energy has to be expended. And here are very good opportunities for mortuary and cemetery workers. Well, perhaps the author knows better. Necrophiliacs conspire to commit suicide on a massive scale.

And here the author took a walk, however, quoting another author about Russian psychology. The main components of the Russian character are pathological cruelty, pathological greed, pathological laziness. In general, this muscle has an unsightly image. Dull, slow-witted, small vocabulary. Alyosha Popovich immediately comes to mind, who showed all his heroic strength (cartoon "Three Bogatyrs"). But they are trouble-free, always in a team, with a sense of duty. For me, the ideal workers on some great construction sites. Man of the crowd.

We come to the main recommendations of the author - to satisfy the sexual satisfaction of your type. In sex, he is primitive, but loves relaxation. Here are recommendations for partners - to relax with a massage, look for sensitive places, and other recommendations suitable for sex trainings. Back to children again - maybe they should be turned on too?

And what does the author advise to somehow calm down these needs? And everything is simple - bestiality. Cheap and cute. This is a man. A male is perfect for a woman. Both options require a devoted friend. Sex with an animal is perfect! So the author cites his beloved bulldoness as an example. And to top off this hymn, he gives the example of a patient who got it into his head to rape a neighbor. The poor man was not lucky - there was an attack of priapism, this is when the erection does not stop and goes to decay. The problem is psychological. And so the good doctors "agreed" with the neighbor, the good soul did not allow her to die from the knife. Most importantly, the neighbor felt like a heroine. Well, I don't know, probably the neighbor is also a muscle with one gyrus. And in general, there must have been other methods. But man is an animal.

And all this is summed up again by lengthy speeches about the Russian mentality. She's muscular, necrophilia want a revolution. And for some reason the conclusion "In Russia there should be a tsar!" What's with the logic, friends? And everything is fine, "as long as the mentality of Russia is muscular, any unbalance will lead to the process of its return to equilibrium through necrophilia." Is it really muscular in Russia, do we now stand with our breasts for the collective?

This is where this dirt poured onto communism as an ideology. That the muscles as one want to die. Why suddenly you like the idea? Yes, because he is stupid, God forgive me, with one gyrus. So, in passing, they threw mud at several generations of our grandparents, who believed in the revolution and its conquests. Believe me, I am calm about communism and, on the whole, do not support the idea of returning to the USSR. For different reasons. But I cannot but respect the people who lived with this idea and built, and even more ascribe to them a tendency to necrophilia. According to the author, the people were satisfied while the benefits were distributed and did not think about anything. In the 90s, I thought about it. And then the communists arrived in time with fears.

It seems to me that the author generally talks about Russia as about some kind of abstract country, distances himself from it - like, here are necrophilous muscles with one gyrus, and they are also implanted with herd feelings. And I am such an individuality over it all.

What else is proposed as a method? And learn how to present the "hieroglyph" like animals. This is your rank in the pack - that is, arch your back back and your chest forward, keep your back straight. This is an unconscious challenge for primates, but it also affects humans. How would we apply this to humans? Shake with something - weapons, diplomas, connections, gadgets. And the children? Yes, the same thing. The main thing is to fix yourself. Apparently, so as not to kill.

The urethral type is the opposite of the anal one. Accordingly, slovens. A striking sign is urinary incontinence. Leader, commander, leader. In childhood, he is freedom-loving, defended by opposition. In adulthood, he is hypersexual, ready to cover all the females of the planet. Well, and of course, since all females are gerontophiles, ready to sleep with their own mother.

And what is the conclusion? A very simple one. “As soon as we forbid the urethral to perform its main archetypal function, we cripple its organism, a capsule of living matter. The species function calls into battle, but society does not allow it into battle for life. " After all, he will drink. And so it will fertilize everyone, and if a woman, give birth to children. I remember the line of Veronica Dolina: "If we lived without any fancy, I would give birth to children, from everyone I loved, of all ranks and stripes." Now I would send her the diagnosis, the airy old woman from France would be surprised.

Urethralists are the leaders, and that says it all. They admit neither rules nor restrictions. Yes, not muscles with one gyrus, God usually does not offend intellect. And yet these people are breaking the old, that is, revolutionaries. They are making a revolution. And the muscles fill all this with blood (terror, repression). Oddly enough, a slave to the idea. What about freedom? Altruist, patriot … Then again there are attacks against necrophiles, such as Afghan veterans, patriotic youth. And the urethral will give everything for the flock. And he needs a risk. And so that everyone would say that he is a genius.

Especially a child. Because otherwise he will praise himself. This prompts such a child to new inventions. Perhaps, and who does not like children to be called a genius?

A frustrated adult, on the other hand, can get drunk. Why? Because the focus is on quickly meeting needs. And in a state of alcoholic intoxication, catharsis quickly occurs, the living of problems. In general, he has enough problems. And the main problem, guess? Of course, it is connected with sexuality. And why? Because culture forbids.

Methods for manipulating representatives of this type are proposed. If you want to go to the registry office, drive past this building, teach it to this road, and he will offer, but you refuse, and then he will carry it in your arms (it seems to me that advice is naive). If it's a child, praise, it will work for free. In general, read all bad advice. But - do not lock. Letting make a revolution, however, "made and turned sour."

And here is the main recipe of the guru on the fight against hypersexuality: “The urethral child needs to be taught masturbation and masturbation as early as possible - this is the only way to compensate for his hypersexual function, because at the age of five or six he has already matured for anything. He needs help to release "vegetative steam", he has no rational perception of himself. At fourteen, he is already a sexually mature male, she is at thirteen, and maybe even earlier. And such children need to create a situation of acceptable sexual comfort. Invite girlfriends and friends, about five people and leave home. They themselves will figure out what to do with them. Otherwise, children will run away from home, where there is no culture of yours with sexual inhibitions, which is harmful to their health, and sometimes even murderous."

Parents of teenagers, do you understand? They quickly dumped out of the house and named a bunch of girlfriends. I wonder how old? And what will the mothers of the girlfriends say? Will they be attracted under the article? It makes no difference, "The Criminal Code is not a hindrance," the author writes. And here is the summary - "For each urethral child - a sex trainer and as soon as possible!" It's in the book, you still need to read it. And if a child psychologist advises you live, what do you say? Maybe you will try to disqualify or at least complain?

I skip the author's research about urethral Europe and the western part of Russia, after all, there are a lot of such historical and political digressions in the book. Including with unexpected appeals “Instead of establishing boundaries between cultures and mentalities, they are creating boundaries between states and peoples. Only a union of cultural federations can still save Russia. And the main of them among equals is the USSR - the North-Slavic Free Motherland! Just above, a lot of slop was poured out on the topic of the totalitarian USSR. Truly, logic.

Making final conclusions about children of this type, the author advises to dodge state education, because it raises slaves. I can agree on something. But to bring up a child so that “it is then that he will be the object of sexual desires of all persons of the opposite sex, from nursery to balzac age” …

That is, do not arrange a harem for him at the age of 13, will he be an alcoholic? Raising a leader is a good task, but thanks to this imposition of leadership, we have already raised a bunch of pseudo-leaders who have “only an erection of ambition” (quote from G. Dansky).

“Leadership is always necessary for self-realization; the leader always acts FOR YOURSELF, to solve their problems, but at the expense of the group,”- we have also seen such people climbing through other people's labors. But do the leaders always care about the pack? Apparently, for the elite - another masterpiece conclusion: “the unrealized leader becomes a leader! Communism on a worldwide scale is a cage that Lenin built for Nadyusha, Inessa, and whatever they called them there."

And why? Because there were sexual prohibitions. Probably, girls were hardly brought in the large and cultured Ulyanov family. "A sexually satisfied urethral does not need leadership!" - that's how. Then it is logical to restrain animal licentiousness, so that a person can do something useful for society apart from general insemination within a radius of several kilometers. He will become a leader, a leader or someone else - maybe he will spend energy not just scattering the seed. And thank God that Lenin's family was traditional. You can argue about the revolution, but his brain was truly analytical, without any urine.