Linguistic Expertise. Mikhail Vigdorchik

2024 Author: Harry Day | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-17 15:43

In the continuation of the first part of the interview with an expert in the field of fate analysis, Mikhail Vigdorchik, as I promised, I present to the readers' attention a linguistic expertise. Let me remind you that Mikhail Ilyich is a candidate of medical sciences, a psychologist, an expert in the field of psychodiagnostics, personality psychology and fate analysis. In addition, Mikhail Ilyich is an independent expert at the forensic medical examination bureau of Odessa and the Odessa region, a specialist in the field of professional selection, medical and criminal psychology.

Mikhail Ilyich, you know that one of the areas of my rubric "Psychology and Psychology" is the so-called linguistic expertise. I suggest you, as an expert, consider a number of statements that relate to fate analysis and psychodiagnostics. You will find out the name of the author of these statements at the end of the interview. In my opinion, this will provide maximum objectivity

Agreed, I'm ready.

Statement # 1: "Diagnostics using the Szondi test is quite simple."

Not certainly in that way. It is simple for those with specialized knowledge. Now I am talking about knowledge of fate analysis and the logic of constructing an interpretation. To interpret the Szondi test, you need to know depth psychology at a certain level, you need to know the content of vector pictures and their interactions. You also need to have a special logic that allows you to formulate interpretive conclusions. Only in this case, the Szondi test for a specialist is an open book.

From your practice, how often do specialists have sufficient knowledge to work with the Szondi test?

This is rare enough. The test is designed to see and say about a person those potencies that he only suspects. Of course, the test also shows what happens to a person in reality. Most often, the subject agrees with something and recognizes himself at some point. At the same time, the effect of denial is certainly also present. The point is that the interpretation is interconnected through the so-called block of linked properties. If there is one, there must be another. Sometimes it is difficult for the subject to accept part of the properties that are determined by him.

Statement # 2: "Szondi's test results are sometimes incredibly accurate."

Unfortunately yes . Sometimes we can see the trauma to which the person himself is attached. We can see the imprints that have formed on the unconscious. We clearly see such a phenomenon as financial losses. We see alcoholism and drug addiction. But sometimes there are dumb and locked profiles. You can't see anything there.

Statement # 3: "The Szondi test is viewed as an abbreviated fate analysis."

I disagree. The Sodney test is an instrument of fate analysis theory. If we talk about the fact that the profile is an X-ray of the unconscious, then the formula of attraction is the formula of fate.

Statement # 4: "To understand how the Szondi test works, study the morphogenetic resonance hypothesis."

A strange and incomprehensible phrase. I do not understand what the author of the statement means and what resonates in what way.

Statement # 5: "The choice of color cards is a fate-analytical diagnosis."

If we talk about Szondi, this was definitely not a classic approach. I'm starting to roughly imagine whose views you are citing. Such a statement could be interpreted in several ways. If we take the Freeling test or the Freeling color mirror, there are certain correlations and the principle of selection is similar. In all projective methods, in particular Luscher, Freeling, Sondi, Fister, there is one and the same model - this is a model of choice. Based on the models of choice, we say that the actions of fate or the hand of fate are a choice. From this point of view, all that we will choose will be the actions of fate.

Statement # 6: "When passing the Szondi test, a person has a dramatic plot in his head and selects characters from life for this drama."

I do not agree, although the idea itself is interesting. A person selects characters for his picture of the world. Again, any interpretation can be set here. For example, a person makes a choice with his own load of internal conflicts and internal drama. When the subject makes a choice, he loads some portraits with positive properties and this is a choice of the super ego. Denial, in turn, is the choice of the repressed "It". That is, his drama stretches into conflict. But at the same time, the choice is made unconsciously. The Szondi test is able to show an internal neurotic or external psychotic conflict.

Statement # 7: “One of this specialist's patients has epilepsy with bipolar disorder. As a result, a sex technique based on the Szondi test is proposed. The technique allegedly studies a person's reaction to portraits of a sexual nature of the opposite sex

Is this really Gypsy? If even with the theory of "+" and "-", then all this is very similar to his deeply personal things. In Szondi's fate analysis none of this exists.